Everyday triggers that writers can't resist

A few weeks ago I became obsessed with a sign in front of the Union Congregational Church in my small New Hampshire town. The black sidewalk sign often broadcasts homey messages in blocky, neon pink or yellow hand lettering. It might say, "Thank you God for the rain," or "God loves you, and you, and, yes, even you." It stands next to the church's driveway, clearly intended to attract parishioners, or at least make passersby smile. 

Then, one day, the sign spoke directly to me: "Handbell choir needs ringers." I was mesmerized. I drove by that sign multiple times on my way to the bank, to the bookstore, to coffee with friends. I kept reading the top-hinged sign, front and back, back and front. 

It wasn't because I was a closet handbell ringer. It was the word "ringers." I knew the intent; the church choir needed another person to ring a handbell. But my mind wandered. I thought of dead ringers, or of being put through a wringer. Then I settled on the definition of a ringer as a cheater; someone who is intentionally placed in a strategic position to game an outcome. I envisioned Double Indemnity, imagining Barbara Stanwyck in a handbell choir.

I was fascinated by a phrase. I knew the word "ringer" had to appear in my writing. I'd just need to wait it out and slip it into a sentence when the time was right.

Burdicks.jpg

A few days later, I found myself in a fine chocolate and patisserie shop that I often visit for the sheer delight of looking through the glass cases at the hazelnut orange cakes or linzer tortes. The exquisitely crafted delicacies are so beautiful, but oh so expensive. I try to limit my purchases there by buying seconds: the little white chocolate mice with broken ears or dark chocolate truffles that lack just the right amount of raspberry crunch topping. 

After inspecting the entire pastry case, bags of chocolate-dipped pears on the side counters, and perfectly formed bars of chocolate nougat at the back wall, I chased down my quarry. I found the seconds in a little basket lined with gift paper. An elegant sign labeled them as "Imperfect bonbons." I snapped a photo so I wouldn't forget those two little words.

I thought about those imperfect bonbons all the way home. How best to use that phrase? In a poem I was writing about the end of a relationship? In an essay about aging in a culture that idolizes youth? Those words were more delectable than the candy itself. I couldn't wait to showcase them in just the right line, at just the right time, in some piece of unsuspecting work.

Later that same night, I had dinner with a group of writers. We were telling stories over our Savignon Blancs about how and where we grew up. Somehow the conversation turned to cuisine and the food we grew up with. I spoke about the Italian dishes that my mother made: the simmering red sauce with homemade meatballs, the pasta fagioli, the polenta with pheasant. My mom made the occasional blackberry pie or sponge cake, but desserts did not play a huge role in our family kitchen.

"There was not a lot of dessert in my house growing up. There just wasn't enough dessert," I said, smiling, mostly for effect.

A new acquaintance, another writer, had an immediate response. "That's a great line," she said. "You need to write about that."

I let out a giggle. My childhood home was filled with love. It didn't seem like a line that spoke to me in a metaphorical way. It was really just a fact: Italians don't make a lot of big desserts. We're mostly a fruit, nut, and biscotti crowd.

But that line spoke to her. She touched my forearm lightly and stared hard into my eyes to be sure she had my attention. "No, really," she said. "You need to use that line in your writing. Just the way you said it."

She made me realize that writing prompts are like speed bumps that slow you down and demand you take notice. It's important to explore them whether they speak to you (the writer) or to someone else (the reader). Maybe they are those imperfect bonbons that serve to keep writing fresh. Or ringers, even, for the truth.

 

 

 

It's your reality show, deal with it

Screen Shot 2016-09-01 at 7.39.35 AM.png

Americans have overheated in this sweltering July. Ninety-degree-plus days have virtually swallowed the lower forty-eight. We barely have the energy to endure the spectacle of political conventions. But now is not the time to look away. Vice presidential picks, distilled policy rhetoric, critical endorsements, and overall fervor are on full display as we head into the final leg of the 2016 presidential race.

Let's start with Cleveland. Like many people, I worried that violence might erupt in the streets or on the floor during the Republican National Convention (RNC). But the oft-maligned city surprised us. It offered an orderly backdrop and played congenial host to a convention whose purpose was to mock convention.

A would-be first lady had no idea whose words were in her mouth. Trump supporters used American flags to shroud a protestor in a startling denigration of first amendment rights. A political rival refused to unite the party, entreating citizens to vote their conscience instead. The headline speakers, Trump’s children, seemed oblivious to the fact that a caring father is no substitute for a devoted public servant and leader of the free world.

Then there was the record-breaking, 76-minute acceptance speech with its self-aggrandizing tone and policies designed for easy consumption by uncritical loyalists. "Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo," said Trump. Not sure how he’ll turn back the clock on globalism, but he believes he alone can make it happen. “We must immediately suspend immigration from any nation that has been compromised by terrorism,” he proclaimed. (Yes, France, that means you.) This statement stacked up improbably with: “I will work to ensure that all of our kids are treated equally.” Apparently, “our kids” are the ones allowed to grow up in America and they alone will be treated equally. Protectionism and isolationism reign.

But policy wasn’t the focus of the RNC; the takedown of Hillary Clinton was. Trump categorized Clinton’s legacy as "death, destruction, terrorism, and weakness." Just the kind of fear-mongering that makes a demagogue proud. The audio soundtrack was notable too. “Lock her up" chants struck a neat balance between persecution and prosecution. This was capped by the never-popular campaign theme song, “You can't always get what you want” by the Rolling Stones. The song seemed to say: "Screw you. I'm your guy. Deal with it." 

I watched the RNC because I couldn't look away; a sad admission. But the question is, who else was watching? Many establishment Republicans were either too embarrassed or too scared to be affiliated with Trump’s candidacy and decided not to attend, including my own state's GOP Senator Kelly Ayotte. Speaker of the House Paul Ryan did his best to bring gravitas to the lightweight proceedings, but even the gifted Ryan was left with little political material to work with. 

This week, it's Hillary's turn. Her vice presidential pick, Senator Tim Kaine, will need to be introduced, elevated, and presumably torn down. There are new email scandals to discuss, along with the resignation of the DNC chair. Bernie’s supporters will get in line, or not. The July heat will still be on, lulling us into complacency. But this is our reality show and we need to be a part of it. At least Trump got one thing right in his speech. History is watching us now.